HOME I CONTACT

You must install Adobe Flash to view this content.
Loading

Serving clients across the spectrum from entrepreneurs to multinational enterprises with world famous brands, Norvell IP is a law firm unique in its approach and depth of expertise.  Our expertise in trademark, copyright and related complex intellectual property matters is unparalleled.  Our firm’s philosophy is to provide superior service with tangible results. 

We have long-standing relationships with our clients, where we understand their needs and work with them to achieve their goals.  Using technology to our advantage, our attorneys and staff are there to assist clients, whenever and wherever they need us.

Norvell IP specializes in all aspects of intellectual property law, from clearance and registration to enforcement of those rights through litigation in the United States federal courts. Norvell IP also counsels its clients on a wide range of other legal issues. Our pragmatic advice and breadth of experience continue to exceed our clients' expectations.

 

 

 

Recent Developments In IP:

  • May 14, 2012
    How to Pick a Name for Your Business (don't forget LEGAL): http://t.co/ncpTSJ4g via @OpenForum
  • May 9, 2012
    INTA’s UNREAL campaign challenges teens + creates awareness re: the risks w/purchasing fake goods. http://t.co/TcvRQ0Eu #INTADC
  • May 7, 2012
    Leonard Lauder: #Trademark is a guarantee of a #Brand's promise of quality and performance. #keynote #INTADC
  • May 7, 2012
    Norvell IP attorneys are in DC! #INTADC 2012
  • April 30, 2012
    2nd Cir. requires actual knowledge or awareness of specific infringing conduct in Viacom v. YouTube case.
  • April 23, 2012
    The USPTO has announced the launch of its new trademark educational outreach program: http://t.co/YtOUxGxU
  • April 15, 2012
    Fed.Cir. rev. Bd’s dism. of Bridgestone’s opp. to MILANZA (tires) as likely to cause conf. w/POTENZA & TURANZA (tires). http://t.co/eBz7jkDS
  • April 2, 2012
    9th Cir dism'd trade dress claim + awarded attys’ fees where P offered no evid. that its traction hoist design was nonfunc. 668 F.3d 677
  • March 26, 2012
    9th Cir. affirmed award of stat damages & attys' fees against restaurant for performing (c)'d music. Restaurants should obtain licenses.
  • March 19, 2012
    4th Cir: laches defense considers when Pl. first knew or should have known of inf. use, not mere use of mark. Ray Comm v Clear Channel Comm